Home » Real Estate » ‘Why out-of-court settlement on disputed property collapsed’
property

‘Why out-of-court settlement on disputed property collapsed’

Counsel to the Kwara State Government and Asa Investment Ltd yesterday narrated why out-of-court settlement on the disputed property collapsed.

Following the discussions on the resolution of the disputed land on which the Ile Arugbo was built, Justice Abiodun Adebara of a Kwara State High Court, sitting in Ilorin, has fixed March 25 for the hearing of the suit challenging the Kwara State Government’s revocation of the land belonging to the late strongman of Kwara politics, Dr. Olusola Saraki.

Justice Adebara had at the last sitting of the court on January 24 advised the parties involved in the case- Asa Investment Ltd and Kwara State Government- to use dialogue in resolving the issue in the interest of peace and harmony.

Thereafter, counsel to the claimants and the defendants held reconciliation meetings on February 6 and 11 at the Governor’s Office, Ilorin.

However, counsel to the Asa Investment Ltd, AbdulAziz Ibrahim and that of the state government, Salman Jawondo, who is the state’s Attorney General yesterday told the court that the peace talks collapsed over irreconcilable differences on the terms of amicable settlement of the dispute.

Ibrahim listed his client’s terms of settlement to include “the reversal of the revocation order placed on the disputed land, reconstruction of the partially demolished structures on the land and offering of apology to the aged women that were harassed on the night when the structures were pulled down.”

He said the state government’s only term of settlement is the insistence that the revocation order placed on the disputed land stands because of public interest.

He, however, expressed the readiness of his clients to forgo the second and third demands in the interest of peace.

Counsel to the state government, Jawondo, said the peace talks collapsed “when the claimants came out frontally that their demand for the reversal of the revocation order placed on the disputed land was not negotiable.”

Jawondo, therefore, sought an adjournment for a proper hearing of the suit.

After listening to the argument and counter-arguments by the counsel to the claimants and the defendants, Justice Adebara hailed both parties and their counsel for meeting twice in their attempts to find an amicable resolution to the crisis as advised by the court.

He advised them to still forge ahead on an amicable resolution of the dispute.

“However, since the two parties have not reached an amicable resolution of the dispute, the suit ought to continue and it’s in this regard that the court will grant an adjournment for hearing.

“I hereby adjourn the case till March 25 for hearing,” Adebara ruled.

Credit: wetinhappen.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*